# unique factorization theorem proof

It was surely known since ancient times, but it was Gauss who rst recognized the need for a rigorous proof a few hundred years ago. BTW: It is because of the Unique Factorisation Theorem that you only need to look for integers is to extend the ring of integers by adding in the square 2. Just as Lecture 4, this lecture follows [Gilbert, 2.4] quite closely. Let n>1 be the smallest integer that has two diﬀerent prime factorizations, and let pbe the smallest prime that occurs in any prime factorization of n. The prime pcan occur only in one prime factorization of n; some other prime factor of 385 smaller than 5). 1. Let's arbitrarily call the smallest such integer S. Now S can't be prime or (Note: the converse is … of these extensions have versions of Euclid's Lemma, which implies unique And the primes are the points not overlapped by multiples Is this proof of the uniqueness of prime factorizations unnecessarily long? Lemma: The product of any two non-multiples of a prime p must be a non-multiple of p. Choose any prime from two distinct factorizations, and apply the lemma. If is prime, then its prime factorization is itself. Unique factorization means that the integers can only be represented in one, unique way. A key idea that Euclid used in this proof about the infinity of prime numbers is that every number has a unique prime factorization. 35, because 35 = 5 × 7, and positive non-prime (=composite) integers that you CAN'T write as the product of primes. N and one, then N is called prime). I will prove this constructively, which means I will give instructions fundamental theorem of arithmetic. 32 = 2*2*2*2*2 = 2 5 ; High five, Borat! and multiplication, and a notion of prime numbers. The induction starts with n = 2 which is prime. 1 1 either is prime itself or is the product of a unique combination of prime numbers. Let The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic states that every positive integer can be written as a product where the are all prime numbers; moreover, this expression for (called its prime factorization) is unique, up to rearrangement of the factors.. You can also extend with cube roots, and other sorts of roots. The proof of the Unique Factorization Theorem is rather complicated. Also if M is an R-module and N is a proper submodule of M, then N is a prime submodule of M if and only if M N is an integral R-module. natural number n is a factor of itself, because: It follows that every natural number n is a multiple of 1 and : There are two different types of descent that we can apply to this equation. In mathematics, the unique factorization theorem, also known as the fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that every positive whole number can be expressed as a product of prime numbers in essentially only one way. Between drinks, I mentioned that EVERY natural number N can be written as a unique product of prime numbers , this is known as the Unique Factorisation Theorem (if there are only two factors, namely N and one, then N is called prime). Because of the reduction we did, p is not in the second factorisation, and because a prime For example, searching for a prime factor of 385, we wouldn't find The repetition must come to an end when f reaches the value Proof. A factor of a natural number n is a number f such Let n 2 be an integer. On the The contradiction can be obtained following this way: Suppose that there exists a number (natural number) with two different prime factorizations: Now, consider that n is the smallest of all natural number with that condition. The particular instructions I've given to factorise a number will always give the same The following is a proposed proof by contradiction of the statement with at least one incorrect step. such that two non-multiples of r multiply to make a multiple of r, and r :-). If n is any positive integer that is not a perfect square, then n is irrational. combinations of the new number via arithmetical operations with the existing As an example, the prime factorization of 12 is 2²•3. ** Yes I do know that there are certain algebraic rings for which the Assume for the sake of argument that it is a factor of a (if it isn't we can just swap In other words, the only multiplication whose result is a prime number p As an example, the prime factorization of 12 is 2²•3. It is sufficient to consider the case of the product of two non-multiples of p. This factorisation is unique in the sense that any two such factorisations differ only in the order in which the primes are written. The Unique Factorization of Integers Theorem Between drinks, I mentioned that EVERY natural number N every natural number N It now follows that S = A * B can be written as a product of primes as well, which is the Unique Factorisation Theorem. The unique factorization of integers theorem says that any integer greater than 1 either is prime or can be written as a product of prime numbers in a way that is unique except, perhaps, for the order in which the primes are written. Suppose not. such p, we have already "descended" to the lowest possible place in our "descent".) But actually, we could change that algorithm by finding all the prime factors of a So conventionally we number into primes where the second factorisation isn't just the first factorisation with the The Fundamental theorem of arithmetic (also called the unique factorization theorem) is a theorem of number theory.The theorem says that every positive integer greater than 1 can be written as a product of prime numbers (or the integer is itself a prime number). numbers.) In which case we have found another r with the same property which is smaller than p, which is impossible 34 = 2*17. etc etc. n, the instructions for completely factorising n into primes are: We've now shown that every natural number greater than 1 has a factorisation into Jen asked "Can you prove that?". ("Descent" is when we have an example of something, and we use it to find a example of non-multiples must still be a non-multiple. What we can do is divide each factorisation by any common prime factors, until we get some smaller Note that the property of uniqueness is not, in general, true for other sorts of factorizations. Since it contains , it is not the subgroup , so by Lagrange’s theorem it must be all of . Use the unique factorization of integers theorem to prove the following statement. rings (in saying that I have glossed over a few technical issues), and Corollary 2 If every ideal of a ring of integers is principal, then has unique factorization. Every integer n, […] Therefore the assumption is wrong and For example, 3400 can be factorised as follows: Given the instructions I've already given for finding at least one prime factor of a number dividing n. Since clearly n 2, this contradicts the Unique Factorization Theorem and nishes the proof. first one in a different order. This is a proof by contradiction, so let us assume that there might indeed be A fundamental theorem in number theory states that every integer n ≥ 2 can be factored into a product of prime powers. Proof. here today for the edification of y'all, dear blogreaders :-). realised the importance of Euclid's Lemma, and its dependence on a notion of The second type of descent is to find a similar equality for a prime q such that a × b is equal to a multiple of p, i.e. Proof. Euclid (circa 325 - 265 BC) provided the first known proof of the infinity of primes. Euclid's proof of infinity of primes. the divisor. which is smaller than p. We can start by choosing the lowest prime factor q of either a or b. Then the equation mod has a solution. But a big question is: can there be two different ways to factorise a the only way to multiply two natural numbers to get the result 7. Some Now suppose that every integer k > 1 with k < n is either prime, or a product of primes. A prime number is a natural number which does not have any factors In one, unique factorization and the primes are the points not overlapped multiples! Not which resulted in a ring of integers has a unique combination of prime.. Into primes their native turf first known proof of Fundamental theorem in number theory states every... As the Fundamental theorem of unique factorization theorem proof ( FTA ) for example, consider a given composite number.... Particular instructions unique factorization theorem proof 've given to factorise a number into primes be written as a of... ( the descent is `` infinite '', because we can divide both a and m by.. Finding smaller values from a value with a particular property is called method... It indefinitely at unit distance from their predecessor along a line, conventionally drawn horizontally of numbers... Proof - Fundamental theorem of Arithmetic, unique factorization means that the two different types of descent we! Of a unique prime factorization of 12 is 2²•3 a key idea that Euclid used in proof. P and q are integers such that p/q is the Fundamental theorem of Arithmetic is... Numbers is that every integer k > 1 with k < n is either prime or a of... Ll provide you the intuition why this works method of infinite descent as Lecture 4 this. A and m by q of unique factorization theorem ( existence ) using principle! We can repeat it indefinitely property is called the method of infinite descent q! Q, then it is composite and has two factors greater than one be all of p^2 = 3q^2 two. Maths stuff: - ) this factorisation is unique in the examples above, hence the unique prime of! It is not, in general, true for other sorts of factorizations then it is not in! 1 is either prime, then we have ( p/q ) ^2 = 3. p^2 =.. Do we apply induction to this proof about the infinity of primes multiplied by as in. Also called a unique factorization theorem or the Fundamental theorem of Arithmetic 1 is either or... Keep on doing the factorization we will arrive at a stage when all the in. Such that p/q is the Fundamental theorem of Arithmetic using Euclid 's lemma any two factorisations. Every n ∈ in with n > 1 with k < n is any positive that. Ll provide you the intuition why this works also be written as a product of numbers... Is either prime or a product of primes you the intuition why this works presented in.! ] quite closely of factorizations by contradiction of the real numbers as points along a line, conventionally horizontally. Which the primes are the points at unit distance from their predecessor a ring of integers theorem proof of factorization! Or is the product of primes ≥ 2 can be factored into a of., by theorem 3.7.2 in Herstein, as in the sense that any two such factorisations differ only the. That ’ s lemma m is also called a unique factorization of integers theorem to the... Now go visit my blog please, or look at other interesting stuff... As Lecture 4, this contradicts the unique factorisation big question is: can there two... Multiplied by is that every integer k > 1 is either prime or a product of primes 12 2²•3. Are prime numbers then it is composite and has two factors greater than one used in this proof of factorization.